-
1.
Low-carbohydrate diets and men's cortisol and testosterone: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Whittaker, J, Harris, M
Nutrition and health. 2022;28(4):543-554
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Testosterone is the primary male sex hormone, and vital for reproductive development and function. Moreover, low endogenous testosterone is associated with an increased risk of chronic disease, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on mens' testosterone and cortisol. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-seven studies with a total of 309 participants. Twelve of these studies were randomised trials whilst the rest were non-randomised. Results show an increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol on short-term low-carbohydrate diets (<3 weeks). In fact, resting cortisol levels return to baseline after <3 weeks on a LC diet, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. Furthermore, high-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone. Authors conclude that further research is required in order to warrant their findings.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Short-term LC-diets diets cause a moderate increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol however this effect is not seen in LC-diets followed for great than 3 weeks
- HP-LC diets caused a statistically significant decrease in resting TT, suggesting caution in relation to endocrine effects of LC diets
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction:
A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted on the effects of low-carbohydrate (LC) versus high-carbohydrate (HC) diets on men’s testosterone and cortisol.
The review was registered with PROSPERO and reported using PRISMA 2020 checklists.
Methods:
A comprehensive search strategy was used to find intervention studies looking at healthy adult males and LC diets of <35% carbohydrate. Studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Sub-group analyses was conducted for diet duration, protein intake and exercise duration.
Results:
The literature search resulted in 27 studies with a total of 309 healthy adult male participants, age: 27.3 ± 4.7 (to minimise variation in steroid hormone metabolism), body mass: 78.6± 7.1kg and BMI: 24.8 ±1.6. 12 randomised and 15 non-randomised controlled trials were analysed. 21 studies were considered low risk bias, 5 medium and 1 high risk.
- Short-term (<3 weeks) LC diets moderately increased resting cortisol (0.41 [0.16, 0.66], p < 0.01) when compared to HC diets.
- Long-term (≥3 weeks) LC diets had no consistent effect on resting cortisol
- LC diets resulted in higher post-exercise cortisol, after long-duration exercise (≥20 min): 0 h (0.78 [0.47, 1.1], p < 0.01), 1 h (0.81 [0.31, 1.31], p < 0.01), and 2 h (0.82 [0.33, 1.3], p < 0.01).
- The overall results for resting total testosterone (TT) showed a significant decrease on LC versus HC diets (SMD = −0.48, p = 0.01. However, subgroup analyses revealed this effect to be limited to high-protein (HP) LC diets, which yielded a very large decrease in TT (SMD = −1.08, p < 0.01; ∼5.23 nmol/L), albeit in a small sample (n = 26).
- Moderate protein (MP) (<35%), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting total testosterone, however high-protein (≥35%), low-carbohydrate diets greatly decreased resting (−1.08 [−1.67, −0.48], p < 0.01) and post-exercise total testosterone (−1.01 [−2, −0.01] p = 0.05).
- There was no overall effect of LC versus HC diets on 0 h post-exercise TT (SMD = −0.03, p = 0.95). However, subgroup analysis showed 0 h post-exercise was non-significantly higher on long-term LC versus HC diets (SMD = 0.44, p = 0.18), and much lower on short-term LC versus HC diets (SMD = −1.01, p = 0.05)
Conclusion:
This systematic review and metanalysis found an increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol on short-term LC diets. Cortisol does return to baseline in the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet. The same response is, however, not seen in post-exercise cortisol, which remains elevated. In addition, the review showed that compared to moderate-protein diets, HP diets were found to cause a large decrease in resting and post-exercise TT (∼5.23 nmol/L).
Clinical practice applications:
The results of this review suggest that exercising whilst following a LC diet can increase cortisol in the short term, but not long-term. This suggests a period of diet adaptation. The effects of long-term LC diets on cardiovascular disease risk is uncertain and healthcare practitioners should monitor client responses and keep up-to-date with new research in this area
Since HP-LC diets were found to significantly decrease resting testosterone it highlights the need to ensure that protein intake does not exceed the urea cycle’s capacity due to potential adverse endocrine effects.
For clients where there is a desire to increase strength, power and hypertrophy, a MP-LC diet could be of benefit, as it showed potential to signal an increased anabolic state post exercise..
NB: Since the review only included a low number of studies and saw within these some heterogeneity that could not be explained, more research is needed before the paper’s findings can be conclusive. The above potential practice applications should therefore be seen as something to be mindful of when working with clients where cortisol and testosterone levels are relevant to their protocol.
Considerations for future research:
Future research should consider:
- Since LC diets have been shown to have a positive effect on health – decreased triglycerides, increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol and weight loss - future studies would benefit from including these markers so any positive and negative impacts can be monitored directly.
- Despite extensive analysis including sensitivity analysis to reduce bias and heterogeneity of the results, the paper highlights a need for further research to ensure consistency in key parameters e.g., exercise duration and intensity, carbohydrate supplements inclusion and period of dietary intervention. Since it was identified that HP-LP diets impact post exercise and resting TT, follow up studies would benefit from consistency in participants diets. This would help to reduce any potential confounding results.
Abstract
Background: Low-carbohydrate diets may have endocrine effects, although individual studies are conflicting. Therefore, a review was conducted on the effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on men's testosterone and cortisol. Methods: The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021255957). The inclusion criteria were: intervention study, healthy adult males, and low-carbohydrate diet: ≤35% carbohydrate. Eight databases were searched from conception to May 2021. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Random-effects, meta-analyses using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, were performed with Review Manager. Subgroup analyses were conducted for diet duration, protein intake, and exercise duration. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included, with a total of 309 participants. Short-term (<3 weeks), low- versus high-carbohydrate diets moderately increased resting cortisol (0.41 [0.16, 0.66], p < 0.01). Whereas, long-term (≥3 weeks), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting cortisol. Low- versus high-carbohydrate diets resulted in much higher post-exercise cortisol, after long-duration exercise (≥20 min): 0 h (0.78 [0.47, 1.1], p < 0.01), 1 h (0.81 [0.31, 1.31], p < 0.01), and 2 h (0.82 [0.33, 1.3], p < 0.01). Moderate-protein (<35%), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting total testosterone, however high-protein (≥35%), low-carbohydrate diets greatly decreased resting (-1.08 [-1.67, -0.48], p < 0.01) and post-exercise total testosterone (-1.01 [-2, -0.01] p = 0.05). Conclusions: Resting and post-exercise cortisol increase during the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate diet. Afterwards, resting cortisol appears to return to baseline, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. High-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone (∼5.23 nmol/L).
-
2.
Efficacy and safety of low and very low carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trial data.
Goldenberg, JZ, Day, A, Brinkworth, GD, Sato, J, Yamada, S, Jönsson, T, Beardsley, J, Johnson, JA, Thabane, L, Johnston, BC
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2021;372:m4743
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diet modification has long been recognised as a component for the treatment of diabetes. Diets low in carbohydrates have been extensively researched, as a diet for those with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of low carbohydrate diets on T2D. The systematic review found 23 studies, including 1357 individuals, investigating the role of low carbohydrate diets on T2D outcomes. Low carbohydrate diet was defined as less than 130g of carbohydrate (less than 26% of calories from carbohydrate) for at least 12 weeks. Results reported at 6 months, found low carbohydrate diets were more effective than a normal diet at achieving diabetes remission. However, this effect diminished at 12 months, although longer term improvements were seen in blood lipids, weight loss and measures of prediabetes. It was concluded that individuals with T2D, eating a low carbohydrate diet for 6 months may reverse the disease. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a short-term low carbohydrate diet to individuals with T2D, to improve their chance of going into remission.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Type 2 diabetes remains a significant and worsening problem worldwide, despite many pharmaceutical developments and a global emphasis on glycemic control.
- This review highlights structured LCDs as a worthwhile option for the management and treatment of diabetes, providing an opportunity for Nutritional Therapy Practitioners to support clients in adopting evidence-informed, modifiable dietary and lifestyle changes for Type Two Diabetes.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes, accounting for 90-95% of cases.
- Previous randomised trials assessed low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) (<26-45% of daily calories from carbohydrate) as encouraging to improve blood glucose control and outcomes of type 2 diabetes but did not systematically assessed remission of diabetes using low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) and very low carbohydrate diets (VLCDs) for people with type 2 diabetes.
- Systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses represent the most valuable, reliable, and objective tool to summarise evidence from primary studies.
- This SR assessed 23 randomised controlled trials comparing LCDs with mostly low fat control diets in individuals / subjects / participants with type 2 diabetes. LCDs were defined as diets with less than 130 g/day or less than 26% of calories from carbohydrates, based on 2000 kcal/day. The authors used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 (RoB 2) to assess methodological quality of evidence, GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence
- On the basis of assessment of moderate to low certainty evidence, individuals / subjects / participants adhering to a LCD for six months may experience remission of type 2 diabetes without adverse consequences.
- Primary outcomes of interest were remission of type 2 diabetes (dichotomously defined as HbA1c <6.5% or fasting glucose <7.0 mmol/L), with or without the use of diabetes medication.
- Eight studies reported on remission of diabetes at six months. Pooled analysis showed that when remission was defined by an HbA1c level below 6.5% independent of medication use, LCDs increased remissions by an additional 32 per 100 patients followed (risk difference 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.47; 8 studies, n=264; GRADE=moderate)
- When remission was defined by an HbA1c level below 6.5% and the absence of diabetes medication, LCDs increased remissions at a lower rate (risk difference 0.05, –0.05 to 0.14; 5 studies, n=199; GRADE=low)
- Additional primary outcomes were weight loss, HbA1c:
- 18 studies reported on Weight loss results (mean difference –3.46, 95% confidence interval –5.25 to –1.67; n=882 (note that positive results not sustained at 12 mo)
- Seventeen studies reported on HbA1c levels at six months, LCDs achieved greater reductions in HbA1c than did control diets (mean difference –0.47%, –0.60 to –0.34; n=747
- Limitations of study: 1) the definition of remission of diabetes, 2) Self-reported dietary intake data are prone to measurement error, particularly in dietary trials in which participants are not blinded
- This SR was funded in part by Texas A&M University.
- The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
The Authors highlight LCD diets incorporating carbohydrate of less than 130 g/day or less than 26% of calories (based on 2000 kcal/day) may be a safe strategy to help individuals with type 2 diabetes achieve weight loss and better blood glucose control over a six-month period. Results may not be sustained at 12 months.
Considerations for future research:
- The definition of diabetes remission needs clarification, especially with regard to threshold concentrations of Hb1Ac or fasting glucose and the use of diabetes medication.
- Safety concerns have been raised with LCDs. Although no significant or clinically important increase in total or serious adverse events was identified in this SR, these outcomes should be reported in future trials to confirm the certainty of evidence for safety.
- The Authors suggest long term, well designed, calorie controlled randomised trials are needed to determine the effects of LCD on sustained weight loss and remission of diabetes.
- Larger treatment effects for LCDs in shorter term trials (3 to <6 months), may be trialed as an effect modifier
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of low carbohydrate diets (LCDs) and very low carbohydrate diets (VLCDs) for people with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Searches of CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CAB, and grey literature sources from inception to 25 August 2020. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials evaluating LCDs (<130 g/day or <26% of a 2000 kcal/day diet) and VLCDs (<10% calories from carbohydrates) for at least 12 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION Primary outcomes were remission of diabetes (HbA1c <6.5% or fasting glucose <7.0 mmol/L, with or without the use of diabetes medication), weight loss, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included health related quality of life and biochemical laboratory data. All articles and outcomes were independently screened, extracted, and assessed for risk of bias and GRADE certainty of evidence at six and 12 month follow-up. Risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Outcomes were assessed according to a priori determined minimal important differences to determine clinical importance, and heterogeneity was investigated on the basis of risk of bias and seven a priori subgroups. Any subgroup effects with a statistically significant test of interaction were subjected to a five point credibility checklist. RESULTS Searches identified 14 759 citations yielding 23 trials (1357 participants), and 40.6% of outcomes were judged to be at low risk of bias. At six months, compared with control diets, LCDs achieved higher rates of diabetes remission (defined as HbA1c <6.5%) (76/133 (57%) v 41/131 (31%); risk difference 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.47; 8 studies, n=264, I2=58%). Conversely, smaller, non-significant effect sizes occurred when a remission definition of HbA1c <6.5% without medication was used. Subgroup assessments determined as meeting credibility criteria indicated that remission with LCDs markedly decreased in studies that included patients using insulin. At 12 months, data on remission were sparse, ranging from a small effect to a trivial increased risk of diabetes. Large clinically important improvements were seen in weight loss, triglycerides, and insulin sensitivity at six months, which diminished at 12 months. On the basis of subgroup assessments deemed credible, VLCDs were less effective than less restrictive LCDs for weight loss at six months. However, this effect was explained by diet adherence. That is, among highly adherent patients on VLCDs, a clinically important reduction in weight was seen compared with studies with less adherent patients on VLCDs. Participants experienced no significant difference in quality of life at six months but did experience clinically important, but not statistically significant, worsening of quality of life and low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 months. Otherwise, no significant or clinically important between group differences were found in terms of adverse events or blood lipids at six and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of moderate to low certainty evidence, patients adhering to an LCD for six months may experience remission of diabetes without adverse consequences. Limitations include continued debate around what constitutes remission of diabetes, as well as the efficacy, safety, and dietary satisfaction of longer term LCDs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020161795.
-
3.
Metabolic, hormonal and performance effects of isomaltulose ingestion before prolonged aerobic exercise: a double-blind, randomised, cross-over trial.
Notbohm, HL, Feuerbacher, JF, Papendorf, F, Friese, N, Jacobs, MW, Predel, HG, Zacher, J, Bloch, W, Schumann, M
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2021;18(1):38
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Isomaltulose is a low-glycaemic index carbohydrate that lowers insulin and glucose levels postprandially. The benefits of taking Isomaltulose in an exercise setting are not well studied. This double-blinded, randomised, crossover study evaluated the effects of Isomaltulose intake on metabolic responses, hormonal responses, exercise performance and gastrointestinal disturbances in runners. Twenty-one male recreational endurance runners took part in four separate experimental sessions to compare Isomaltulose to maltodextrin and glucose. Fat and carbohydrate oxidation rates were not different among groups. This might be because the lower dose of Isomaltulose (50g) was used in this trial. Compared to glucose and maltodextrin, isomaltulose lowered metabolic and hormonal responses to exercise. In the study, Isomaltulose, glucose, and maltodextrin did not differ in exercise performance or gastrointestinal disturbances. A higher dose may be needed in order to demonstrate exercise performance, but caution should be exercised since a higher dose may cause gastrointestinal upset. A robust investigation of Isomalulose dose and its effects on glucose, insulin, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptides is required to determine if exercise leads to hypoglycaemia in the clinical population. Healthcare practitioners can use the findings of this study to understand the advantageous effects of 50g Isomaltulose in regulating glucose, insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide during aerobic exercise.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isomaltulose has been discussed as a low glycaemic carbohydrate but evidence concerning performance benefits and physiological responses has produced varying results. Therefore, we primarily aimed to investigate the effects of isomaltulose ingestion compared to glucose and maltodextrin on fat and carbohydrate oxidation rates, blood glucose levels and serum hormone concentrations of insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). As secondary aims, we assessed running performance and gastrointestinal discomfort. METHODS Twenty-one male recreational endurance runners performed a 70-min constant load trial at 70% maximal running speed (Vmax), followed by a time to exhaustion (TTE) test at 85% Vmax after ingesting either 50 g isomaltulose, maltodextrin or glucose. Fat and carbohydrate oxidation rates were calculated from spiroergometric data. Venous blood samples for measurement of GIP and insulin were drawn before, after the constant load trial and after the TTE. Capillary blood samples for glucose concentrations and subjective feeling of gastrointestinal discomfort were collected every 10 min during the constant load trial. RESULTS No between-condition differences were observed in the area under the curve analysis of fat (p = 0.576) and carbohydrate oxidation rates (p = 0.887). Isomaltulose ingestion led to lower baseline postprandial concentrations of blood glucose compared to maltodextrin (percent change [95% confidence interval], - 16.7% [- 21.8,-11.6], p < 0.001) and glucose (- 11.5% [- 17.3,-5.7], p = 0.001). Similarly, insulin and GIP concentrations were also lower following isomaltulose ingestion compared to maltodextrin (- 40.3% [- 50.5,-30.0], p = 0.001 and - 69.1% [- 74.3,-63.8], p < 0.001, respectively) and glucose (- 32.6% [- 43.9,-21.2], p = 0.012 and - 55.8% [- 70.7,-40.9], p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, glucose fluctuation was lower after isomaltulose ingestion compared to maltodextrin (- 26.0% [- 34.2,-17.8], p < 0.001) and glucose (- 17.4% [- 29.1,-5.6], p < 0.001). However, during and after exercise, no between-condition differences for glucose (p = 0.872), insulin (p = 0.503) and GIP (p = 0.244) were observed. No between-condition differences were found for TTE (p = 0.876) or gastrointestinal discomfort (p = 0.119). CONCLUSION Isomaltulose ingestion led to lower baseline postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin and GIP compared to maltodextrin and glucose. Consequently, blood glucose fluctuations were lower during treadmill running after isomaltulose ingestion, while no between-condition differences were observed for CHO and fat oxidation rates, treadmill running performance and gastrointestinal discomfort. Further research is required to provide specific guidelines on supplementing isomaltulose in performance and health settings.
-
4.
Comparison of dietary macronutrient patterns of 14 popular named dietary programmes for weight and cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Ge, L, Sadeghirad, B, Ball, GDC, da Costa, BR, Hitchcock, CL, Svendrovski, A, Kiflen, R, Quadri, K, Kwon, HY, Karamouzian, M, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2020;369:m696
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Dietary recommendations to combat obesity and its associated risk for heart disease are extensive. Many different diets and patterns of eating are being tried by millions of people, however no systematic review comparing their effectiveness has been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of 14 popular diets and diets which restrict certain nutrients on weight loss and heart disease risk. The results identified 121 studies with 21942 patients for inclusion. The Atkins diet, the Zone diet and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet were the most effective for weight loss and for reducing blood pressure. Low carbohydrate and low-fat diets achieved similar weight loss when compared to a normal diet. Low carbohydrate diets had less effect on heart disease risk factors than low fat and moderate macronutrient diets. There were no improvements in good cholesterol with any of the diets. Interestingly any benefits on weight loss for any of the diets disappeared after 12 months and this was also observed for heart disease risk, except in those on the Mediterranean diet. It was concluded that most diets show improvements to weight loss and heart disease risk factors over 6 months, however these are largely unsustainable after 12 months. Differences between diets are small and healthcare practitioners could use this study to recommend any number of diets to achieve weight loss and the Mediterranean diet in particular to decrease heart disease risk. However, it is important to understand that this may be a short-term fix and at 12 months patients need to be assessed to ensure that weight loss is sustained.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the relative effectiveness of dietary macronutrient patterns and popular named diet programmes for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor improvement among adults who are overweight or obese. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and CENTRAL from database inception until September 2018, reference lists of eligible trials, and related reviews. STUDY SELECTION Randomised trials that enrolled adults (≥18 years) who were overweight (body mass index 25-29) or obese (≥30) to a popular named diet or an alternative diet. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Change in body weight, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and C reactive protein at the six and 12 month follow-up. REVIEW METHODS Two reviewers independently extracted data on study participants, interventions, and outcomes and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) approach. A bayesian framework informed a series of random effects network meta-analyses to estimate the relative effectiveness of the diets. RESULTS 121 eligible trials with 21 942 patients were included and reported on 14 named diets and three control diets. Compared with usual diet, low carbohydrate and low fat diets had a similar effect at six months on weight loss (4.63 v 4.37 kg, both moderate certainty) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (5.14 mm Hg, moderate certainty v 5.05 mm Hg, low certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (3.21 v 2.85 mm Hg, both low certainty). Moderate macronutrient diets resulted in slightly less weight loss and blood pressure reductions. Low carbohydrate diets had less effect than low fat diets and moderate macronutrient diets on reduction in LDL cholesterol (1.01 mg/dL, low certainty v 7.08 mg/dL, moderate certainty v 5.22 mg/dL, moderate certainty, respectively) but an increase in HDL cholesterol (2.31 mg/dL, low certainty), whereas low fat (-1.88 mg/dL, moderate certainty) and moderate macronutrient (-0.89 mg/dL, moderate certainty) did not. Among popular named diets, those with the largest effect on weight reduction and blood pressure in comparison with usual diet were Atkins (weight 5.5 kg, systolic blood pressure 5.1 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 3.3 mm Hg), DASH (3.6 kg, 4.7 mm Hg, 2.9 mm Hg, respectively), and Zone (4.1 kg, 3.5 mm Hg, 2.3 mm Hg, respectively) at six months (all moderate certainty). No diets significantly improved levels of HDL cholesterol or C reactive protein at six months. Overall, weight loss diminished at 12 months among all macronutrient patterns and popular named diets, while the benefits for cardiovascular risk factors of all interventions, except the Mediterranean diet, essentially disappeared. CONCLUSIONS Moderate certainty evidence shows that most macronutrient diets, over six months, result in modest weight loss and substantial improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, particularly blood pressure. At 12 months the effects on weight reduction and improvements in cardiovascular risk factors largely disappear. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015027929.
-
5.
Non-Systematic Review of Diet and Nutritional Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease in Obesity.
Rychter, AM, Ratajczak, AE, Zawada, A, Dobrowolska, A, Krela-Kaźmierczak, I
Nutrients. 2020;12(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nutrition is a major factor influencing obesity associated heart disease risk, however many people with this disease do not follow nutritional recommendations. This review of 155 studies aimed to summarise dietary aspects of heart disease prevention. The paper began by outlining the role of obesity through the development of other disorders that contribute to heart disease, such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and blood sugar imbalance. The quantity and distribution of fat tissue also can contribute to heart disease risk, especially if it is located within the heart or around the major organs of the body. Dietary factors which can increase heart disease risk were described as an increased intake of processed foods, sugar, salt and certain fats and low intakes of fruit, vegetables, fibre, whole grains, beans and nuts. The Mediterranean diet, the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet, plant-based diets, the portfolio dietary pattern and low carbohydrate diets were all reviewed and although mixed results were stated for low carbohydrate diets, most of the diets reviewed reported improved heart disease outcomes. The role of intestinal microbiota in heart disease were also reviewed and the influence of a poor diet was implicated in imbalanced gut microbiota and the development of heart disease. It was concluded that an unhealthy diet can contribute to heart disease and that dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet and plant-based diets may be favourable for its management. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to individualise dietary recommendations for patients with heart disease or who are at risk of it.
Abstract
Although cardiovascular disease and its risk factors have been widely studied and new methods of diagnosis and treatment have been developed and implemented, the morbidity and mortality levels are still rising-cardiovascular disease is responsible for more than four million deaths each year in Europe alone. Even though nutrition is classified as one of the main and changeable risk factors, the quality of the diet in the majority of people does not follow the recommendations essential for prevention of obesity and cardiovascular disease. It demonstrates the need for better nutritional education in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment, and the need to emphasize dietary components most relevant in cardiovascular disease. In our non-systematic review, we summarize the most recent knowledge about nutritional risk and prevention in cardiovascular disease and obesity.